| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1999-08-14
                 
                 
                linux vs win: Rant 2er Script/gelehrter
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Uner dem schlichten Titel verbirgt sich ein  
rabiat/non/platonischer Dialog zweier Script/gelehrter über die  
technischen Grundlagen des momentanen Zeitalters, die  
programm/philosophischen Hintergründe Sanctae Trinitatis  
Windows, Unix und Mac absolviert von Woodchuck alias djv  
aka Dave [answer] und Ranger [quote]. 
 
Eine der Schlüsselstellen preist die Genialität Microsofts  
nachgerade vernichtend. 
 
Absolviert auf der Liste der DefCon Hacker, einem Peripatos,  
wo Dekonstruktion als re-compiling selbverständlich ist. 
 
Während im Peripatos [Säulengang - wörtlich: peri = herum;  
patos= das Gehen] Denker die Gedanken  beim Herumgehen  
produzierten, entstehen sie hier literal: Räumlich entfernt und  
noch immer Zeit verzögert. Aber nicht nachträglich mittels  
Tontafel und Gedächtnis nieder- & schöngeschrieben,  
sondern unterlegt mit fernen Donnern eines aufziehenden  
Gewitters, wie sie im echten Leben üblich sind. 
   
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
Subject: 	Re: linux vs. win To: 	ranger0@earthling.net  
(Ranger) Date sent: 	Sat, 14 Aug 1999 09:59:38 -0400  
(EDT) Copies to: 	djv@bedford.net, dc-stuff@dis.org  
 
Well, certain of the haxorly inclined did have Suns and  
Apollos in their garrets. 
 
At some point, the cost of low-end Sun became quite  
competitive with high-end PC + full development software to  
equal the usual Unix bundle.  This point was unremarked by  
the marketplace, though, and especially by M$-whoring  
mags like "PC World". 
 
It's the fundamental curse of our times: Microsoft is a  
fantastic corporation, with brilliant management. Their only  
shortcoming is that they don't know shit about operating  
systems or application software.  Everything else, brilliant.   
It's a miracle, like discovering that the Yugo is "Car of the  
Century". 
 
> hardware support and gaming capability of Linux is brought  
up to speed it > will have a hard time invading the desktop of  
john q. public.  Win9x sucks > ass, but the common luddite  
has no concern or idea, he wants to play "Duke > Nukem"  
and have all the software and internet all bundled up, and a  
nice > little restore CD image to use when he inevitably fucks  
it all up. 
 
I agree.  The word "desktop" means "interactive" (i.e. dumb  
terminal) to me, but "standalone box" to you. 
 
I ran Unix on a 286 PC, actually.  Microport Sys VR2.  It  
really sucked. (Circa 1986). 
 
A way to bring Linux to every home in the moneyed world: 
 
	*) Do your improvements (which boil down to plug and  
play) (I consider any Unix/Linux installation to be easier than  
any Windoze one, and that it has been that way for years.   
Reason: "A windoze installation never ends"... it requires  
endless tweaking, often reinstallation.) 
 
	*) Market a righteous X terminal at a $250 retail, that  
would network over power lines. (Or some other wireless  
LAN. Details irrelevant). 
 
	*) Software: multiplayer games, and for the paranoid, all  
kinds of snoopy-ware to make sure than Heather and Cody  
aren't looking at any pr0n. 
 
	*) Embed the OS in ROM, on something idiot-proof  
pluggable like PCMCIA.	 
 
> > The virus exists because M$ OSes are pieces of shit.  
Car door locks > > are traditionally pieces of shit, hence the  
existence of the Slim Jim. > > I never said they weren't  
pieces of shit.  Although certain flavors have 
 
I don't accuse you of it.  My thesis is that the *form* of the  
most common "nasty" M$ attack is the virus, for the same  
reason that the Slim Jim is the most common attack on car  
door locks. 
 
If Unix were as widespread as M$, there would be more  
attacks against it. 
 
Actually the gaping hole in Unix is probably X.  X has many  
of the swiss-cheese features of Windoze -- resulting from  
being designed for an open environment free of malice, and  
then having security shoe-horned in, under and around it later  
on. 
 
> some improvements over others, but there is still _a_lot_ to  
be desired.  I > also agree that it has gotten to the point that  
trying to correct it now > would be damn near impossible.   
However, I'll continue to contend, if that > shitty little OS with  
the same amount of holes and exploits weren't so > prevalent  
the amount of virii would be significantly smaller.  The MAC  
OS 
 
True.  If rabbits weren't a problem, there wouldn't be foxes  
and .22 rifles. 
 
> has a ton of shitty holes and problems (8.5, 8.6 are about  
as bloated as MS, > and crash as regularly), but the number  
of virii and hacks for the MAC are > far eclipsed by those for  
MS. > > Damn, these things never fail to turn into a jihad,  
reason #1 why the > outlook conversion is now filtered..... 
 
Oh, I'm not jihading.  If someone takes it that way, that's an  
error. 
Dave 
 
relayed by  
dc-stuff@dis.org 
 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by  
published on: 1999-08-14 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |