|
search / subscribe / upload / contact |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| RSS-Feed Depeschen |  |
|
|
||
|
||
Date: 2000-05-08
Europol-Dokument Volltext Online-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- Dokument zu publizieren, das wirklich echt sein dürfte - es gab zumindest kein Indiz, dass gegen die Echtheit spricht. Wenn dem so ist, dann haben mindestens vier namentlich bekannte Beamte der EU-Kommission bei einem Treffen der Gruppe "Polizeiliche Zusammenarbeit" nicht nur versichert, die Kommission stehe nach wie vor den Abhörplänen der Polizei positiv gegenüber. Diese Vertreter eines Europa, wie es nicht werden soll, haben den versammelten Polizeidelegationen auch noch geraten, mit Hilfe einer "Kinderporno"-Argumentation Abhörbefugnisse durchzudrücken. Der entsprechende Ausschnitt ist unten in der Mail angefügt. Andy Müller-Maguhn vom CCC meint, das müßte mehr als Grund genug sein, die Entlassung dieser Eurokraten aus dem EU-Dienst hier und jetzt zu fordern: Schließlich werden sie nicht dafür bezahlt, Spin-doctoring für die Abhörpläne der gesetzlich ermächtigten Behörden zu betreiben. Die Police Cooperation Working Group ist jene, die ihre offiziellen Dokumente mit dem Kürzel ENFOPOL versieht. das Dokument http://www.quintessenz.at/q/index.html Der Mirror auf John Youngs cryptome http://cryptome.org/policecp.htm -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- special tnx an Bo Elkjaer & Harald W -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- From: <erenriche@quintessenz.at> To: John Young Subject: Nice doc 4 cryptome Date sent: Mon, 8 May 2000 12:39:55 +0200 Dear John, As far as we could check it out - this doc is authentic. If u could mirror it we would be grateful. Look at this truly scandalous passage excerpted below - we will demand that those EU commission officials who offer so generous spin doctoring tips 4 law enforcement should be dismissed from office . -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- C. Police Co-operation Working Group (technical and scientific police matters) C1 - Interception of telecommunications. The Presidency provided information on the state of play. It noted 4 main points. 1- As far as user requirements are concerned the PCWG could not proceed further. The Finnish Presidency regretted that it would not have time during its mandate to follow this matter. 2- In previous meetings it had been discussed that it could be sensible to get some political support from upper instances in the Council for this matter to go forward. The Presidency reported that the chairman of CATS said that "although that was not a very simple question, efforts will be made in that direction". Moreover, the Presidency noted that the Mutual Legal Assistance Group was achieving results on this issue. 3- It recalled the negative press that this issue has received in the media and wondered whether the MS should react to it. It suggested to prepare a press release setting out in clear terms the position of the Council as regards the discussions on interception of telecommunications. 4- Finally, it has emerged that it might be useful to inform the EP on how this issue had been evolving. Against this background, the Presidency thus recognised that progress in this matter is being very slow. The Group had a lively discussion on the basis of the points presented by the Presidency. Several delegations expressed some caution as regards the preparation of a press release, noting that this could provoke a chain reaction and further negative press in the media. The Commission, whilst noting that its position has not changed, informed delegations that a possible way to break the deadlock could be following a similar strategy as that followed in tackling the issue of Child Pornography in the Internet. Although acknowledging that this was a different topic it also has an interception dimension. The Commission invited delegations to study the conclusions of the Vienna Conference The Presidency concluded saying that it would come back to the matter of interception at the next meeting. -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- Upmost document http://www.quintessenz.at/q/index.html -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- edited by Harkank published on: 2000-05-08 comments to office@quintessenz.at subscribe Newsletter - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
|
|
|
 |
related topiqs |
 |
CURRENTLY RUNNING |
q/Talk 1.Juli: The Danger of Software Users Don't Control
|
|
|
!WATCH OUT! |
bits4free 14.Juli 2011: OpenStreetMap Erfinder Steve Coast live in Wien
|
|