| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 2000-12-04
                 
                 
                UK:  Lizenz zum Datamining
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Wie gut, dass es die Briten gibt, denn nirgendwo anders  
äußern die Geheimdienste ihr Bestreben, die gesamte  
Kommunikation der Gesellschaft in die Hände zu kriegen.  
GSM und Internet Provider, Telekoms et al sollen gezwungen  
werden, die gesamten, in ihren Netzen angefallenen  
Verbindungsdaten [Logfiles & c] ein Jahr lang selbst zu  
hosten. Für die nächsten sechs Jahre sollen die kompletten  
Verbindungsdaten dann den Nachrichtendiensten ausgeliefert  
werden zum Zweck des Dataminings. 
 
Es geht um die Erstellung von Kommunikations- und  
Bewegungsprofilen und nicht - wie der Observer meint - um  
Inhalte der Kommunikation. 
 
Wer sollte dieses Papier anders hosten als der  
unverzichtbare John Young? 
 
http://cryptome.org/ncis-carnivore.htm
                   
 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
Titelstory des Observer heute 
 
Secret plan to spy on all British phone calls  
 
Kamal Ahmed, political editor Sunday December 3, 2000  
 
Britain's intelligence services are seeking powers to seize all  
records of telephone calls, emails and internet connections  
made by every person living in this country.  
 
A document circulated to Home Office officials and obtained  
by The Observer reveals that MI5, MI6 and the police are  
demanding new legislation to log every phone call made in  
this country and store the information for seven years at a  
vast government-run 'data warehouse', a super computer that  
will hold the information.  
 
The secret moves, which will cost millions of pounds, were  
last night condemned by politicians and campaigners as a  
sinister expansion of 'Big Brother' state powers and a  
fundamental attack on the public's right to privacy.  
 
Last night, the Home Office admitted that it was giving the  
plans serious consideration.  
 
Lord Cope, the Conservative peer and a leading expert on  
privacy issues, said: 'We are sympathetic to the need for  
greater powers to fight modern types of crime. But vast  
banks of information on every member of the public can  
quickly slip into the world of Big Brother. I will be asking  
serious questions about this.' Maurice Frankel, a leading  
campaigner on per sonal data issues, called the powers  
'sweeping' and a cause for worry.  
 
The document, which is classified 'restricted', says new laws  
are needed to allow the intelligence services, Customs and  
Excise and the police access to telephone and computer  
records of every member of the public.  
 
It suggests that the Home Office is sympathetic to the new  
powers, which would be used to tackle the growing problems  
of cybercrime, the use of computers by paedophiles to run  
child pornography rings, as well as terrorism and international  
drug trafficking.  
 
Every telephone call made and received by a member of the  
public, all emails sent and received and every web page  
looked at would be recorded.  
 
Calls made on mobile phones can already be pinpointed  
geographically, as can those made from land lines. The  
police would be able to use 'trawling' computer techniques to  
look through millions of telephone and email records.  
Campaigners say innocent people could have such highly  
personal information accessed.  
 
The document admits the moves are controversial and could  
clash with the Human Rights Act, which gives people a right  
to privacy, European Union law and the Data Protection Act,  
which protects the public against official intrusion into private  
lives.  
 
The office of the Data Protection Commissioner, Elizabeth  
France, has already expressed 'grave concerns' .  
 
'A clear legislative framework needs to be agreed as a matter  
of urgency,' says the document, which is dated 10 August  
and is thought to have been sent to Home Office Minister  
Charles Clarke.  
 
'Why should data be retained? In the interests of justice, to  
preserve and protect data for use as evidence to establish  
proof of innocence or guilt. For intelligence and evidence  
gathering purposes, to maintain the effectiveness of UK law  
enforcement, intelligence and security agencies to protect  
society.'  
 
The document is written by Roger Gaspar, the deputy  
director-general of the National Criminal Intelligence Service,  
the Government agency that oversees criminal intelligence in  
the United Kingdom. Gaspar, as head of intelligence for  
NCIS, is one of the most powerful and influential men in the  
field.  
 
The report says it is written 'on behalf of Acpo [the  
Association of Chief Police Officers], HM Customs and  
Excise, security service, secret intelligence service and  
GCHQ [the Government's secret listening centre based at  
Cheltenham]'.  
 
Gaspar argues telephone companies should be ordered to  
retain all records of phone calls and internet access.  
 
At the moment many telephone and internet service providers  
keep data for as little as 24 hours.  
 
'In the interests of verifying the accuracy of data specifically  
provided for either intelligence or evidential purposes, CSPs  
[communication service providers such as telephone or  
internet companies] should be under an obligation to retain  
the original data supplied for a period of seven years or for as  
long as the prosecuting authority directs,' the document  
says.  
 
'Informal discussions have taken place with the office of the  
data protection commissioner. Whilst they acknowledge that  
such communications data may be of value to the work of the  
agencies and the interests of justice they have grave  
reservations about longer term data retention.' The document  
says the new data warehouse would be run along similar  
lines to the National DNA Database for profiles of known  
criminals.  
.... 
 
A spokesman for NCIS refused to be drawn on the report. 'I  
am not going to comment on a classified document that is in  
unauthorised hands,' he said.  
 
Meanwhile a Home Office spokesman said it had received  
the proposals and was considering them.  
 
More 
http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,406191,00.h
                   
tml 
 
 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
World-Information Forum 
24 11 2000 Technisches Museum Wien 
http://world-information.org/html/site_index/index.htm
                   
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by  
published on: 2000-12-04 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |